Sometimes DH Lawrence Wrote About Nature as Well

12 Aug

DictionaryAs a logophile, I love a good word. There are so many wonderful words out there: tourniquet, crumbly, and trousers, just to name a few. One of my favourite words is nature—it’s brilliant because it’s got so many nuances, so many shades of meaning. Said in a certain way, it may imply wickedness, but, whispered softly, it can be quite lovely (not unlike the word whore).  Despite the fact that the OED takes almost 178 column inches to explain all of its many definitions, ultimately the word can be broken down in two major categories.

Mother Nature

When I was a small child, my parents took me to an ecology rally in Loch Arbour (NJ) where millions of concerned citizens gathered to acknowledge our responsibility to the environment. There I saw a placard (or it might have been a billboard) that read “It’s not nice to fool Mother Nature.” This was the first time I had encountered this particular archetype: the caring maternal spirit of the Earth, who provides for all her children. Needless to say, given my personal experience with matriarchs, it did not ring true for me. However, I can see what they were going for. Mother Nature symbolizes everything that the natural (as opposed to man-made) world offers us, not just our basic needs like food, water, clothing and shelter, but also those things which make so many of us happy, like sunshine, the scent of lilacs, birdsong and cannabis. We’ve got to do better at taking care of nature—it’s not just about cleaning up after ourselves; we’ve got to change our whole attitude and show it the respect it deserves before it’s too late.

Human Nature

There’s some dispute about the concept of human nature. Some people focus on our individual characters, our constitutions or outlooks. They believe each of us has a personal nature: we may have a hot temper or the patience of a saint, we may be trustworthy or we may be devious. Our dispositions are determined by many factors, such as genetics or the influence of our parents or the skills of our hypnotherapist or maybe our wires are just wonky. But do groups of people have their own nature? Is it the nature of all artists to be tortured or the nature of all young people to be fucking idiots?  Psychologists and pornographers are also continuously debating the different natures of men and women—does the arrangement of our chromosomes alter our essences, causing some of us to enjoy making sandwiches and others to prefer shifting bricks?

If there were ever a war between the two categories of nature, let’s face it, Mother Nature would be the hands down winner. The most horrible things on Earth—from violence and destruction to pollution and racism—are the domain of humankind. This is why I struggle to look a tree in the eye.

My explanation of the multiplicity of meanings in just one single word serves as evidence that they’re real clever inventions. Basically, the set up is you put some letters into a certain order and together they make a word which you can write as well as speak and which represents ideas, people and objects, really anything you can think of. This actually works in all languages—including the ones with those funny letters.

Clever, eh?

5 Responses to “Sometimes DH Lawrence Wrote About Nature as Well”

  1. Old Doc Brandel Monday, 13 September 2010 at 16:12 #

    Dear Agatha:

    I shall for evermore, when enjoying the beauty of nature, hear someone whisper, “whore”. Thank you, Agatha, for this gift.

  2. Agatha Whitt-Wellington (Miss) Monday, 20 September 2010 at 00:27 #

    Dearest Doc,

    So lovely to hear from you! I was sure that a certain mutual acquaintance of ours had told me some time back that you were in solitary confinement in foreign prison (though thinking back this was around the time you won the Mister Mambo of the Midwest competition, so I imagine his motivation was jealousy).

    I hope you are thriving and still dominating on the dance floor.

    Yours,
    Agatha

    PS I always think of you whenever I hear the words “vamos a mambear,” which luckily in my line of work, I rarely hear.

  3. Mrs. B Saturday, 2 October 2010 at 16:05 #

    Darling Agatha (dare I say darling? Am I too bold?) —

    Is it human nature for a fucking idiot (male, 18 years old) to insist that his idiocy (instigating fights in the dormitory which result in black eyes and swollen lips all around) is a natural part of the male psyche?

    What is psyche, anyway, and are males allowed to have one?

    I eagerly await your reply.

    Mrs. B

  4. Mrs. B Saturday, 2 October 2010 at 16:08 #

    By the by, I am disappointed in you. Using D.H. Lawrence in a bait-and-switch is unfair.

  5. Agatha Whitt-Wellington (Miss) Saturday, 2 October 2010 at 16:24 #

    I have been campaigning for years to get the word psyche stricken from our psychology books, particularly with regards to men. Although its definition now is a generic human soul, let us not forget that the first Psyche was in fact a woman–beautiful and with a lot of love to give. This hardly describes any man I know. Inspiring women to be more Psyche-like is what the word really means to me. I suppose, in the end, I feel more comfortable placing my trust in the stories of a book called “The Golden Ass” than I do in any theories originally written in German.

    By the way, I knew ol’ DH well and let me tell you, he was always happy for a woman to use him in any way, if you get my drift.

    Yours,
    Agatha

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: